Supranational species indices are combined in multispecies indicators. These are produced for groups of species according to their main habitat types. To produce precise indicators with small standard errors, it is important to include as many bird species as possible. The rationale behind the construction of composite indicators is that each species is seen as a replicate that may respond in the same way to environmental drivers as the other species and repeats the same signal.
After the supranational species indices have been produced, species are checked for their suitability to be included in the indicators. If a species trend (i.e. multiplicative trend) is classified as ´uncertain´ AND if the index value is > 200 % or < 5 %, data are considered doubtful and the species index and data quality are examined in detail. The decision to exclude such a species from an indicator depends on whether this species was already used in previous versions of the indicators, whether better data can be expected in the near future and whether index fluctuation is believed to be caused either by poor data or by other reasons linked to methodology.
For some species the available time series started later than first year. In such cases, the multispecies index has been calculated using the chaining method (e.g. Marchant et al., 1990; Ter Braak et al., 1994) that is incorporated in the indicator tool, assuming that the average change in all other species of the indicator reflects the changes of the focal species during the period that is missing.
As with species trends and indices, the interannual consistency of the indicators is examined: new versions are compared with previous ones. In case any inconsistency is found, we investigate whether this is caused by improvements in the data (e.g. improved national data sets, longer time series, new countries contributing their data) or by a computation error.
Box Species selection and classification
To produce common bird indicators, species that are to be included have to be selected and classified according to habitat types in Europe.
So far, three versions of our PECBMS European species selection/classification have been produced and used. Initially based on expert judgment and comprising only a limited number of species, the procedure has developed to a more formal classification of species at the level of bio-geographical regions and more than 100 species are nowadays used to produce indicators.
The first set of European indicators was based on 47 common bird species. They were classified by the national coordinators of monitoring schemes and other experts who met at the PECBMS workshop in Prague in 2002 (read the report in the Bird Census News 16/1). The second set of European indicators comprised an enlarged species set, classified according to the publication by Tucker & Evans (1997). Since 2007, when the third set of European indicators was produced, the species classification is based on assessments within bio-geographical regions in Europe, as described below.
The recommendation to classify species at the level of bio-geographical regions in Europe comes from a PECBMS mini workshop held in March 2005 in Lednice, Czech Republic. It would take into account that birds do slightly different things in different places, so that for instance a bird species that is to be considered as a forest species in one region may qualify as a generalist species elsewhere. Also, it would make better use of local expertise.
The procedure initiated in Lednice was approved and developed further at the PECBMS workshop in Prague, Czech Republic, in September 2005 (read the report in the Bird Census News 19/1). Regional coordinators, who were responsible for the production of regional species lists in cooperation with all relevant experts within their regions, were appointed and a time schedule was approved. Distinguished regions were: ´Continental´, ´Atlantic´, ´Mediterranean´, and ´Boreal´.
Note that the bio-geographical regions were used solely for species habitat classification, not for the imputation of missing values when computing supranational population indices, where geographical regions were used instead.
[blue] ´Atlantic´: Belgium, Denmark, France Atlantic (Atlantic part of the country), West Germany Atlantic (Atlantic part of the country), Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, UK.
[yellow] ´Mediterranean´: France Mediterranean (Mediterranean part of the country), Italy Mediterranean (Mediterranean part of the country), Spain, Portugal.
[brown] ´Continental´ (incl. Pannonian region): Austria, Czech Republic, East Germany, West Germany Continental (Continental part of the country), France Continental (Continental part of the country), Hungary, Italy Continental (Continental part of the country), Poland, Switzerland, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Lithuania.
[green] ´Boreal´: Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Norway, Sweden.
As we are focusing on common birds, abundant and widespread species are to be used preferably. Species with > 50 000 breeding pairs in ´PECBMS Europe´* are considered to be widespread. However, other species could be added too. These are species which are not well covered by generic monitoring schemes, a main source of PECBMS data. Such species are difficult to detect by generic schemes because of their biology, for example those with nocturnal activity (e.g. owls), some congregatory and colonial species or extremely rare species. Data from species specific monitoring schemes would be needed, however this is currently out of the scope and capacity of PECBMS.
Non-native species are excluded, being an unnatural component that doesn´t contribute to the quality of the avifauna.
The species selected were classified to three groups: characteristic farmland species, characteristic forest species, and other species. We classified them according to their predominant regional habitat use – farmland, forest, other: the percentage of the regional population that uses farmland/forest for breeding or feeding (0-25; 25-50; 50-75, >75; situation in 2000). Any links with a driving force were indicated.
Then, we checked if the species selected are sufficiently abundant in the regions, compared species selection and classification between regions, compiled a final species list and circulated it to national coordinators for discussion and approval.
Finally, regional species classifications were combined into the PECBMS European species classification. For this general classification a species was assigned to a particular habitat category if:
- at least two regions provided their classification and all providing regions agreed, or
- only one region (minority) classified a species differently than the others.
In some cases a species classification was provided by one region only, but if the species was concentrated in that region and didn´t occur elsewhere in Europe, the species regional classification was accepted as European too.
If regional classifications differed completely, a species was considered as ´other species´.
The final list of species and their classification can be downloaded here.
* ´PECBMS Europe´ is EU 27 + Norway and Switzerland and consists of those countries which already deliver their data to PECBMS or are supposed to do so in the near future: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Ireland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom.
However, some parts of these countries (states) were excluded, mainly because of their far distance to the mainland of Europe: Faroe Islands and Greenland, Svalbard, Azores, Madeira, Canary Islands, Gibraltar.